Sam Vilain wrote: > MAEDA Naoaki wrote: >>> Ok, so that's not as bad as it looked. So, while it is still O(N), the >>> fact that it is O(N/HZ) makes this not a problem until you get to >>> possibly impractical levels of runqueue length. >>> >> Do you mean N is the size of the loop? for_each_cpu_mask() loops >> the number of CPUs times. It is not directly related to runqueue length. >> > > Ok, I mistook it for a per-task loop. > > Well, let me know if you think it's worth trying it out anyway.
I don't think this loop would be a bottle neck, but test by third person is always valuable. Thanks, MAEDA Naoaki _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
