On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 15:01 -0700, Paul Menage wrote:
> On 8/4/06, Chandra Seetharaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 14:34 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 14:29 -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> > > > It might solve the problem in hand. But, as a user, if i see a file i
> > > > would expect some data in that file. There is no relevant data to be
> > > > displayed here.
> > >
> > > Is there _nothing_ which would be helpful to a user which could be added
> > > to such a file?
> >
> > i can't think of anything in _this_ interface.
> >
> > BTW, the idea of looking for _something_ to add to an otherwise empty
> > file also doesn't sounds good.
>
> So is there an argument against moving to reporting things like
> membership (and maybe arbitrary stats) via sysfs rather than configfs?
No, actually there is no argument on sysfs/configfs. We implemented it
in configfs. Thats all.
I think configfs also has the PAGE_SIZE limitation.
>
> Paul
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose....
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | .......you may get it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
