On Fri, 4 Aug 2006 17:14:53 -0700 "Paul Menage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyhow, I'd not have any argument against the current reliance on > configfs, if there was a way to make use of seq_file or some other > less-constrained interface for returning things like group members, > stats, etc. Presisely how complex _is_ a seq_file addition to configfs? seq_file is pretty straightforward... And I don't really see that adding this seq_file thing makes configfs conceptually more complex: it's just internal machinery to overcome a limitation of a presently-existing feature. And if we can get stuck over stuff like this, one wonders how we're ever going to implement that memory controller ;) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
