On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 12:59 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 12:15 -0700, Rohit Seth wrote: > > My preference would be to have container (I keep on saying container, > > but resource beancounter) pointer embeded in task, mm(not sure), > > address_space and anon_vma structures. > > Hmm. If we can embed it in the mm, then we can get there from any given > anon_vma (or any pte for that matter). Here's a little prototype for > doing just that: > > http://www.sr71.net/patches/2.6.18/2.6.18-rc4-mm1-lxc1/broken-out/modify-lru-walk.patch > > See file/anon_page_has_naughty_cpuset(). Anybody see any basic problems > with doing it that way? > > One trick with putting it in an mm is that we don't have a direct > relationship between processes and mm's. We could also potentially have > two different threads of a process in two different accounting contexts. > But, that might be as simple to fix as disallowing things that share mms > from being in different accounting contexts, unless you unshare the mm.
But anon_vmas could be shared across different processes (with different mms). -rohit ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
