Rohit Seth wrote: > On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 10:23 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > >>On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 10:16 -0700, Rohit Seth wrote: >> >>>>That said, it sure is simpler to implement, so I'm all for it! >>> >>>hmm, not sure why it is simpler. >> >>When you ask the question, "which container owns this page?", you don't >>have to look far, > > > as in page->mapping->container for user land? in case of anon_vma, page->mapping can be the same for 2 pages beloning to different containers.
>>nor is it ambiguous in any way. It is very strict, >>and very straightforward. > > What additional ambiguity you have when inode or task structures have > the required information. inodes can belong to multiple containers and so do the pages. Kirill ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
