On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 12:54 +0400, Kirill Korotaev wrote: > Rohit Seth wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 10:23 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > > > >>On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 10:16 -0700, Rohit Seth wrote: > >> > >>>>That said, it sure is simpler to implement, so I'm all for it! > >>> > >>>hmm, not sure why it is simpler. > >> > >>When you ask the question, "which container owns this page?", you don't > >>have to look far, > > > > > > as in page->mapping->container for user land?
> in case of anon_vma, page->mapping can be the same > for 2 pages beloning to different containers. > In your experience, have you seen processes belonging to different containers sharing the same anon_vma? On a more general note, could you please point me to a place that has the list of requirements for which we are designing this solution. > >>nor is it ambiguous in any way. It is very strict, > >>and very straightforward. > > > > What additional ambiguity you have when inode or task structures have > > the required information. > inodes can belong to multiple containers and so do the pages. > I'm still thinking that inodes should belong to one container (or may be have it configurable based on some flag). -rohit ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
