Ar Gwe, 2006-08-25 am 15:23 -0700, ysgrifennodd Chandra Seetharaman: > > Bean counters can exist with no tasks, and the CKRM people have been > > corrected repeatedly on this point. > > Hmm... from what I understand from the code, when the last resource in > the beancounter is dropped, the beancounter is destroyed. Which to me > means that when there are no tasks in a beancounter it will be > destroyed. (I just tested the code and verified that the beancounter is > destroyed when the task dies).
If a task created resource remains then the beancounter remains until the resources are destroyed, so it may exit well after the last task (eg an object handed to another process with a different luid is stil charged to us) > Let me reword the requirement: beancounter/resource group should _not_ > be destroyed implicitly. It should be destroyed only when requested by > the user/sysadmin. In other words, we need a create_luid() and > destroy_luid(). So that you can preserve the limits on the resource group ? That also makes sense if you are trying to do long term resource management. Alan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech