Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > On Thu, 2006-09-07 at 00:47 +0530, Balbir Singh wrote: > > <snip> >> Some not quite so urgent ones - like support for guarantees. I think >> this can > > IMO, guarantee support should be considered to be part of the > infrastructure. Controller functionalities/implementation will be > different with/without guarantee support. In other words, adding > guarantee feature later will cause re-implementations. I'm afraid we have different understandings of what a "guarantee" is. Don't we? Guarantee may be one of
1. container will be able to touch that number of pages 2. container will be able to sys_mmap() that number of pages 3. container will not be killed unless it touches that number of pages 4. anything else Let's decide what kind of a guarantee we want. >> be worked out as we make progress. >> >>> I agree with these requirements and lets move into this direction. >>> But moving so far can't be done without accepting: >>> 1. core functionality >>> 2. accounting >>> >> Some of the core functionality might be a limiting factor for the >> requirements. >> Lets agree on the requirements, I think its a great step forward and then >> build the core functionality with these requirements in mind. >> >>> Thanks, >>> Kirill >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
