Rohit Seth wrote: >Containers: > > [...]
>This is based on lot of discussions over last month or so. I hope this >patch set is something that we can agree and more support can be added >on top of this. Please provide feedback and add other extensions that >are useful in the TODO list. > Hi Rohit, Sorry for the late reply. I was just about to comment on your earlier patchset but I will do so here instead. Anyway I don't think I have much to say other than: this is almost exactly as I had imagined the memory resource tracking should look like. Just a small number of hooks and a very simple set of rules for tracking allocations. Also, the possibility to track kernel allocations as a whole rather than at individual callsites (which shouldn't be too difficult to implement). If anything I would perhaps even argue for further cutting down the number of hooks and add them back as they prove to be needed. I'm not sure about containers & workload management people, but from a core mm/ perspective I see no reason why this couldn't get in, given review and testing. Great! Nick -- Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -- and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
