Paul Menage wrote: > On 10/31/06, Pavel Emelianov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> That's functionality user may want. I agree that some users >> may want to create some kind of "persistent" beancounters, but >> this must not be the only way to control them. I like the way >> TUN devices are done. Each has TUN_PERSIST flag controlling >> whether or not to destroy device right on closing. I think that >> we may have something similar - a flag BC_PERSISTENT to keep >> beancounters with zero refcounter in memory to reuse them. > > How about the cpusets approach, where once a cpuset has no children > and no processes, a usermode helper can be executed - this could
Hmm... Sounds good. I'll think over this. > immediately remove the container/bean-counter if that's what the user > wants. My generic containers patch copies this from cpusets. > >> >> Moreover, I hope you agree that beancounters can't be made as >> module. If so user will have to built-in configfs, and thus >> CONFIG_CONFIGFS_FS essentially becomes "bool", not a "tristate". > > How about a small custom filesystem as part of the containers support, > then? I'm not wedded to using configfs itself, but I do think that a > filesystem interface is much more debuggable and extensible than a > system call interface, and the simple filesystem is only a couple of > hundred lines. This sounds more reasonable than using configfs for me. > Paul > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
