> Consensus/Debated Points > ------------------------ > > Consensus: > > - Provide resource control over a group of tasks > - Support movement of task from one resource group to another > - Dont support heirarchy for now > - Support limit (soft and/or hard depending on the resource > type) in controllers. Guarantee feature could be indirectly > met thr limits. > > Debated: > - syscall vs configfs interface
OK. Let's stop at configfs interface to move... > - Interaction of resource controllers, containers and cpusets > - Should we support, for instance, creation of resource > groups/containers under a cpuset? > - Should we have different groupings for different resources? I propose to discuss this question as this is the most important now from my point of view. I believe this can be done, but can't imagine how to use this... > - Support movement of all threads of a process from one group > to another atomically? I propose such a solution: if a user asks to move /proc/<pid> then move the whole task with threads. If user asks to move /proc/<pid>/task/<tid> then move just a single thread. What do you think? ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
