On 4/3/07, Serge E. Hallyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But frankly I don't know where we stand right now wrt the containers > patches. Do most people want to go with Vatsa's latest version moving > containers into nsproxy? Has any other development been going on? > Paul, have you made any updates?
I've not made major changes since the last patch post, just some small optimizations and fixes - I've been too tied up with other stuff. Whilst I've got no objection in general to using nsproxy rather than the container_group object that I introduced in my latest patches, I think that Vatsa's approach of losing the general container object is flawed, since it loses any kind of per-group generic state (e.g. "this container is being deleted") and last time I saw it, I think it would tend to lose processes so that they didn't show up in any directory in the container fs. Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
