Paul Menage wrote: > On 4/5/07, Pavel Emelianov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > That sort of implies that we need to split the container fork >> > mechanism up into two parts, one early to add the refcount to the >> > parent's container_group, and one late to handle the callbacks if >> > desired. But that should be pretty straightforward. >> >> Splitting sounds good. I'll try to prepare an appropriate patch. > > I just did this in my tree. It's a pretty simple patch, but it's a bit > ugly.
OK. When you send it we'll see what can be improved. >> >> 2. early need for rss containers (earlier than initcalls >> >> are called) >> > >> > Couldn't you copy the way cpuset_init_early() works? >> >> I did this in my previous version of rss container, >> but I think it can be generalized. This is initialization >> code that must not be nice-looking, but if it can be it >> should be. >> > > Agreed, nice looking code is better :-) > > Did you have any suggestions, other than moving container_init() > earlier in the boot process? Right now I do not. Calling container_init_eary() is OK from my POV. What I do not like is that I have to reinitialize container->create() callback. Maybe it's better not to call ->create in container_register_subsys() at all? > Paul > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
