On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 12:09:50PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote: > IF (note that /if/ again) the count returned is zero, then my point was > we can destroy nsproxy behind foo and also B1, not worrying about a > 'struct file' still pointing to B1. This stems from the fact that you > cannot have a task's file->f_bc pointing to B1 w/o the task itself > pointing to B1 also (task->nsproxy->ctlr_data[BC_ID] == B1). I also > assume f_bc will get migrated with its owner task across beancounters > (which seems reasonable to me atleast from 'struct file' context). > > If there was indeed a file object still pointing to B1, then that can > only be true if rcfs_task_count() returns non-zero value. Correct?
arghh .. s/B1/A1 pls -- Regards, vatsa ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
