On 4/10/07, Srivatsa Vaddagiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ Sorry abt piece meal reviews, I am sending comments as and when I spot
> something ]
That's no problem.
>
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 04:32:24PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > -void container_exit(struct task_struct *tsk)
> > +void container_exit(struct task_struct *tsk, int run_callbacks)
> > {
>
> [snip]
>
> > + /* Reassign the task to the init_container_group. */
> > task_lock(tsk);
>
> [snip]
>
> > + if (tsk->containers != &init_container_group) {
>
> Is this check needed? If we have the check, then:
>
> > + task_unlock(tsk);
> > + if (cg)
> > + put_container_group(cg);
>
> init_container_group refcount is leaky (fork increments it, but exit
> doesnt). Not a big prob perhaps, but ..would be nice to avoid?
>
Yes, I think you're right - over a long uptime that would just cause
problems ...
Paul
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech
