On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 07:51:12 +0530 Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > I'd have hoped to see containerstats.c in here.
> > 
> 
> The current statistics code is really small, so it fit into taskstats.c.
> May be in the future, we could re-factor it and move it out.

I was referring to your userspace tool which reads this stuff.  The one
which you described in the changelog.

> >> +  rcu_read_lock();
> >> +
> >> +  for_each_root(root) {
> >> +          if (!root->subsys_bits)
> >> +                  continue;
> >> +          root_cont = &root->top_container;
> >> +          get_first_subsys(root_cont, NULL, &subsys_id);
> >> +          do_each_thread(g, p) {
> > 
> > this needs tasklist_lock?
> > 
> 
> rcu_read_lock() should be fine. From Eric's patch at
> 
> 2.6.17-mm2 - proc-remove-tasklist_lock-from-proc_pid_readdir.patch
> 
> The patch mentions that "We don't need the tasklist_lock to safely
> iterate through processes anymore."
> 

oh, OK.  rcu_read_lock() is the new lock_kernel() - always hard to tell
what it's locking.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech

Reply via email to