Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 07:51:12 +0530 Balbir Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
>> Andrew Morton wrote:
>>> I'd have hoped to see containerstats.c in here.
>>>
>> The current statistics code is really small, so it fit into taskstats.c.
>> May be in the future, we could re-factor it and move it out.
> 
> I was referring to your userspace tool which reads this stuff.  The one
> which you described in the changelog.
> 

Ahh.. yes.. I'll make the changes and repost with the tool.

>>>> +  rcu_read_lock();
>>>> +
>>>> +  for_each_root(root) {
>>>> +          if (!root->subsys_bits)
>>>> +                  continue;
>>>> +          root_cont = &root->top_container;
>>>> +          get_first_subsys(root_cont, NULL, &subsys_id);
>>>> +          do_each_thread(g, p) {
>>> this needs tasklist_lock?
>>>
>> rcu_read_lock() should be fine. From Eric's patch at
>>
>> 2.6.17-mm2 - proc-remove-tasklist_lock-from-proc_pid_readdir.patch
>>
>> The patch mentions that "We don't need the tasklist_lock to safely
>> iterate through processes anymore."
>>
> 
> oh, OK.  rcu_read_lock() is the new lock_kernel() - always hard to tell
> what it's locking.
> 

:-) I'll add a comment to make it clearer.


-- 
        Warm Regards,
        Balbir Singh
        Linux Technology Center
        IBM, ISTL

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
ckrm-tech mailing list
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech

Reply via email to