On 26/06/07, Brad Beveridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi guys. I really like the cl-opengl bindings, well done! Would somebody care to give a few lines describing how they were made & the underlying philosophy? From reading the code it looks totally hand tailored, apart from the automatic enum generation.
The cl-opengl-thomas branch also generates the (low-level) bindings from the spec.
Is this an accurate statement? Are the bindings so nice simply because a lot of care was taken?
Yes, I believe a lot of care was taken. The lispy feel is there because the automatically generated bindings aren't exported directly. -- Luís Oliveira http://student.dei.uc.pt/~lmoliv/ _______________________________________________ cl-opengl-devel mailing list cl-opengl-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-opengl-devel
