On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 9:27 PM, Bart Botta <000...@gmail.com> wrote: > Does anyone have objections (or better alternatives) to changing the > return values to integers, and either adding a function to compare > them (gl:enum= maybe?) to keywords, or adding a shortcut to look up an > enum (probably gl:enum)?
What about splitting gl:enum back into multiple ones like it used to be? Perhaps keeping the big enum, since it makes sense for some of the functions, I suppose. Could we generate this automatically from the spec? -- Luís Oliveira http://student.dei.uc.pt/~lmoliv/ _______________________________________________ cl-opengl-devel mailing list cl-opengl-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-opengl-devel
