On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Luís Oliveira<luis...@gmail.com> wrote: > What about splitting gl:enum back into multiple ones like it used to > be? Perhaps keeping the big enum, since it makes sense for some of the > functions, I suppose. Could we generate this automatically from the > spec?
Doesn't help, since there are cases where a particular value has multiple names, even when returned by the same function. For example when an extension adds a value, with -foo on the name, then it gets added to the core without the -foo, but the same value. So code using the extension should check for the -foo name, while code using the newer GL version should check for the name without -foo, even though both are actually looking for the same numerical value. (and it would probably be hard to generate automatically from what I remember of trying to do so last time) -b- _______________________________________________ cl-opengl-devel mailing list cl-opengl-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cl-opengl-devel
