> I'm interested, which MIME decoder is better: Political wars coming out perhaps?
> - ClamAV's built-in, written by Nigel Horne I can't personally speak of ClamAV's mime decoder - so I won't try to. > - ripMIME, written by Paul L Daniels > Which is more stable/reliable, faster, etc. ? It's probably important here to state the purpose of ripMIME, essentially it's meant to try and weed out every attachment it can, even sometimes at the expense of having to violate the much beloved RFC's (believe me, I would much rather write RFC pure decoders). I'm not sure what GMime's ability to decode non-standard emails are like (ie, such as those which Nessus tests with)? Also, ripMIME does a bit more than decoding purely at the MIME level, as it now decodes, TNEF and OLE (MS Office) files. Regards. -- Paul L Daniels http://www.pldaniels.com Linux/Unix systems Internet Development ICQ#103642862,AOL:pldsoftware,Yahoo:pldaniels73 A.B.N. 19 500 721 806 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Clamav-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-devel
