On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 15:31:52 -0700
James Paige <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Dale Walsh wrote:
> > 
> > On Jul 29, 2005, at 04:45 PM, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> > 
> >> On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:23:57 -0400
> >> Dale Walsh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> I've already linked against 0.13.38 and it doesn't appear to have any
> >>> ill effects on libclamav so maybe what is in 0.13.38 is compatible
> >>> with the fixes you implemented in 0.10.27.
> >>>
> >>
> >> No, it isn't. Please read the sources and hopefully you will  understand
> >> what I was talking about.
> >>
> >>
> >>> I's catching viruses and doesn't look like there are any problems..
> >>>
> >>
> >> I have no time to explain in which cases your compilation will fail.
> >>
> >> -- 
> >>    oo    .....         Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Tomasz, can I get a diff on the changes you implemented in zziplib  please?
> > 
> > -- Dale
> 
> I know Tomasz is a busy man ;) but if he remembers which version of 
> zziplib was originally forked for inclusion in clamav, it would not be 
> difficult for one of us to create the diff.

The current zziplib code in libclamav is based on 0.12.83

-- 
   oo    .....         Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  (\/)\.........         http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg
     \..........._         0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B
       //\   /\              Sat Jul 30 13:17:45 CEST 2005

Attachment: pgpc1Ve6BwVDI.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html

Reply via email to