-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Tomasz Kojm wrote: > On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:07:42 +0100 > Gianluigi Tiesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It seams you want flame me, I've only expressed my opinions but not >> asked you to use my decisions. > > I think you're still missing the point of this discussion. And the point is > that changing the line 233 of libclamav/filetypes.c to "if(!(iscntrl(buf[i]) > || isprint(buf[i])) || !internat[buf[i] & xff])" you seriously broke the > detection. That's all and the rest is off-topic. > I agree with you about the OT, but still not agree about the code, we have scanned 1gb of various malware (all types also non ext) detected by clamav or not, and there was no false negatives in the scan. I've seen in svn it was commented, so yes better to leave it out ;) If you find some serious possible false negative problem, please tell me so I will be happy to remove the code.
Bye - -- Gianluigi Tiesi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> EDP Project Leader Netfarm S.r.l. - http://www.netfarm.it/ Free Software: http://oss.netfarm.it/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFF5fH23UE5cRfnO04RAteXAKCmoZQ1sYn2tpKPW40AZEEzYM15FgCbBWnS IqvII22JR13h8gDMyCco0JE= =oJzT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net
