On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 11:17:02AM +0100, Tomasz Kojm said: > On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 01:21:34 +0000 > Stephen Gran <st...@lobefin.net> wrote: > > > I've just received the bug report below via the Debian bug tracking > > system. There's obviously not a whole lot I can do about it myself, but > > I just thought I'd bring it to your attention. > > Yeah, we got this information as well: > > https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1366
Now that I've been doing some looking, I see that there is also a bundled -ltdl in the source tree. I'm not aware of any license issues with libtool (although as it's an FSF project, I wouldn't be surprised to see it move to v3 in the future). Is this just a convenience copy, or is because of a license problem I'm unaware of? If it's just a convenience copy, can we give it the same treatment, and preferentially use the system copy? It'll probably mean patching the version of the ltdl m4 that you have in favor of something that doesn't produce totally broken make targets when you try to get it to use the system libtool. Currently, if you pass --with-ltdl-dir=/usr/lib, it add -L/usr/lib as a preprequisite, and if you pass --with-ltdl-dir=/usr/lib/libltdl.la, configure goes off and looks for /usr/lib/libltdl.la/libltdl.la and doesn't find it and exits. Grrr. -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Stephen Gran | Look before you leap. -- Samuel | | st...@lobefin.net | Butler | | http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net
