On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:52:17AM +0200, Török Edwin said: > On 2009-02-20 03:13, Stephen Gran wrote: > > Now that I've been doing some looking, I see that there is also a > > bundled -ltdl in the source tree. I'm not aware of any license issues > > with libtool (although as it's an FSF project, I wouldn't be surprised > > to see it move to v3 in the future). Is this just a convenience copy, > > or is because of a license problem I'm unaware of? > > > > If it's just a convenience copy, can we give it the same treatment, and > > preferentially use the system copy? It'll probably mean patching the > > version of the ltdl m4 that you have in favor of something that doesn't > > produce totally broken make targets when you try to get it to use the > > system libtool. > > > > Currently, if you pass --with-ltdl-dir=/usr/lib, it add -L/usr/lib as > > a preprequisite, and if you pass --with-ltdl-dir=/usr/lib/libltdl.la, > > configure goes off and looks for /usr/lib/libltdl.la/libltdl.la and > > doesn't find it and exits. > > > > It already picks the system ltdl, *IF* you have libltdl7-dev installed > (which is currently in experimental, waiting to be uploaded in sid). > It won't work with an older ltdl, and I don't think it would be wise to > downgrade libtool.
Ah, that's all right then - I can just wait on that making it to unstable to develop against it. Cheers, -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Stephen Gran | "I'd love to go out with you, but I'm | | st...@lobefin.net | taking punk totem pole carving." | | http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-devel.html Please submit your patches to our Bugzilla: http://bugs.clamav.net
