Re: [clamav-users] Gibe passes undetected through clamd?

[Ted Fines]

Aah, if I'd only padi more attention to the README.  I was going by the 
docs on the web site, at 
<http://clamav.elektrapro.com/doc/html/node16.html>, which hasn't ben 
updated yet.

Question regarding CONTSCAN.  It still returns a single virus, not a list 
of the ones it found.  Is the virus name it  returns just the LAST one it 
found?

Ted

--On Thursday, June 19, 2003 7:45 PM +0200 Tomasz Kojm 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Note that neither is found, but the test signature in the clamav source
IS  found.  Why is this?  Is it that SCAN exclusively scans archives?
Likewise, the results using RAWSCAN are also inconsistent, depending on
how  clamd is invoked:
RAWSCAN and SCAN stop scanning when first virus is found. You should use
CONTSCAN.
Best regards,
Tomasz Kojm
--
      oo    .....       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
     (\/)\.........     http://www.konarski.edu.pl/~zolw
        \..........._   I nie zapomnij kliknac w brzuszek...
          //\   /\\     <- C. Amboinensis    www.pajacyk.pl          
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]