On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 07:51:32AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote: > would provide a way to fail more gracefully. Blocking all incoming mail might be > an option for an individual user, but an ISP would probably want an option to > simply let the mail flow unchecked while a warning was sent to somebody. Waking > up to discover that your mail servers have been offline all night and your users > are raising hell is not a good way to start a day. > > Of course the best option would be for the code not to fail in the first place, > but ... :)
I'm using the clamav-milter, and when clamd dies, mail is not blocked: Sep 2 01:53:53 jane sm-mta[29805]: [ID 801593 mail.error] h825rrvg029805: Milter (clamav): local socket name /var/run/clmilter.sock unsafe Sep 2 01:53:53 jane sm-mta[29805]: [ID 801593 mail.info] h825rrvg029805: Milter (clamav): to error state -j ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
