At 08:12 AM 9/3/2003, you wrote:
On Wed, Sep 03, 2003 at 07:51:32AM -0700, Brian W. Antoine wrote:
> would provide a way to fail more gracefully. Blocking all incoming
mail might be
> an option for an individual user, but an ISP would probably want an
option to
> simply let the mail flow unchecked while a warning was sent to
somebody. Waking
> up to discover that your mail servers have been offline all night and
your users
> are raising hell is not a good way to start a day.
>
> Of course the best option would be for the code not to fail in the
first place,
> but ... :)
I'm using the clamav-milter, and when clamd dies, mail is not
blocked:
Sep 2 01:53:53 jane sm-mta[29805]: [ID 801593 mail.error]
h825rrvg029805: Milter (clamav): local socket name
/var/run/clmilter.sock unsafe
Sep 2 01:53:53 jane sm-mta[29805]: [ID 801593 mail.info]
h825rrvg029805: Milter (clamav): to error state
*shrug* It blocks it under my sendmail install. If that's configurable,
I'd sure like to know how to do it.
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
