On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Nigel Horne wrote: > On Wednesday, March 10, 2004, at 09:31 pm, Damian Menscher wrote: > > > > By the way, while I'm being picky, perhaps sending a bounce message (as > > opposed to rejecting the message) is not an appropriate default? > > That isn't the default action. You have to give the --bounce option > for a bounce to be generated
Sorry, I was unclear. The "bounce" is a message to the original recipient and to the postmaster saying that a virus has been filtered. Not quite as bad as sending it to a non-existent sender, but still a bit annoying, since all it says is that you failed to receive some message. Hard to imagine why anyone would want this. Damian Menscher -- -=#| Physics Grad Student & SysAdmin @ U Illinois Urbana-Champaign |#=- -=#| 488 LLP, 1110 W. Green St, Urbana, IL 61801 Ofc:(217)333-0038 |#=- -=#| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.uiuc.edu/~menscher/ Fax:(217)333-9819 |#=- -=#| The above opinions are not necessarily those of my employers: |#=- -=#| UIUC CITES Security Group || Beckman Imaging Technology Group |#=- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
