Tomasz Papszun wrote:

[...]

> 2) clamdscan can be configured (in clamav.conf) to use more features
> than you requested for clamscan in command line (e.g. ScanMail). If so,
> scanning with clamdscan can require more resources than simple
> 'clamscan'.

I think that is exactly what is happening. If I use clamscan --mbox it
takes almost as long as clamdscan to process a large file. The interesting
thing is that clamscan --mbox will usually complain about running out of
memory a long time before clamdscan complains about memory. That may have
something to do with FreeBSD's process vs. threading memory limits though.

-- 
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v)  423-559-5145 (f)
http://www.wingnet.net




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Clamav-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users

Reply via email to