> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Daniel > Lord > > > Those signatures don't catch the poc xploit found at > http://www.gulftech.org/?node=downloads. But maybe it's better to > leave this alone till there are real worms etc. to produce good > signatures. At the moment clamav sigs don't seem good enought to > catch this. (No support for absolute offsets) >
I think it is really good for ClamAV's name to be able to catch the worms even before they are created... It seems really cool to me. -Samuel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ Clamav-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/clamav-users
