Ken Jones wrote:
> I think the thing to remember here is that we are discussing scanning
> of email. If the email is malicious, then having clamav remove it is
> a good thing in my opinion. Spam (uce/ube) that poses no threat to
> the user, and is just an anoyance is what SA should be catching.
ClamAv is marketed as an antivirus tool. I think, as you say, there is a need
for a generic anti-malware tool. But don't call it clamav.
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
perl -e"map{y/a-z/l-za-k/;print}shift" "Jjhi pcdiwtg Ptga wprztg,"
_______________________________________________
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
