Peter Bonivart wrote: > There's plenty of happy Postfix users running MailScanner, the Postfix > author doesn't like the way MailScanner interacts with its queues and > Postfix users who do not use MailScanner are quick to judge.
I never said there weren't. Working, however, and working reliably in a consistent and permanent fashion, are completely seperate things. I have no dislike of MailScanner, but to recommend it to someone to use with a certain MTA when it is known to run the risk of losing|corrupting email with that MTA, however remote the chance, is stupidity and borderline negligent. Anyhow, back to my original point to the Lady who asked, MailScanner is perfectly happy with any other MTA. Amavis should work with any MTA. You also have Xamime, which will work with all except Qmail, as far as I know. > Anyway, if you don't have a very good reason for using Postfix, stay > with Sendmail since it's faster than Postfix with MailScanner. It has to > do with Postfix using only one queue file per message and MailScanner > having to rewrite the whole file. Anyhow, since you were the first one to do the handbag swinging, who has a certain software combination fetish and is the one being jugdemental? And as for being a "Postfix user", I am also an Exim and a Sendmail "user". Grow up. I gave pertinent, and truthful, advice to the question, that is all. Matt _______________________________________________ http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
