Peter Bonivart wrote:
> > Anyhow, back to my original point to the Lady who asked, MailScanner
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Thanks for telling me even though I didn't ask.
As you can see above, I wasn't mentioning it for your sake.
> > Postfix users who do not use MailScanner are quick to judge.
> Handbag swinging? I didn't even reply to your post, but to hers so who's
> Ok, but I still didn't reply to your post so I'm not sure what that
> information is for.
Did I say you replied to my post. No. I replied to your comment about
"Postfix users being quick to judge". Or was I misjudging your reply? I
believe not.
> You gave a short warning that is proven wrong by many happy users, if
> you call that all the fancy things above it's your choice. You have a
> very short fuse Matt.
That is like saying that knives aren't a lethal instrument, for it is
proven wrong by the many people who have not been stabbed and killed.
1) I do know that you did not reply directly to my post.
2) I do not have a short fuse.
3) I do, however, take umbrage when someone says, either intentionally or
through lack of concept of the proper use of written or spoken Queens
English, that I am quick to judge. Phrase your replies in the context
you mean, if that was not your intention.
All the best,
Matt
_______________________________________________
http://lists.clamav.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clamav-users
