On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 13:27:31 +0000
Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Tuesday 01 Mar 2005 13:09, Steve Platt wrote:
> 
> > > The problem has been already fixed in CVS.
> > > 
> > 
> > Tomasz (et al),
> > 
> > I hope I'm wrong but having downloaded the "latest snapshot"
> > yesterday and compiled it up I don't see any improvement.
> > 
> > I am assuming that the tarfile snapshots are equivalent to using the
> > "CVS" (+/- a day)?
> 
> Looks OK to me:
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ clamscan 23893.0.dodgy.eml
> 23893.0.dodgy.eml: OK
> 
> ----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
> Known viruses: 31317
> Engine version: devel-20050301
> Scanned directories: 0
> Scanned files: 1
> Infected files: 0
> Data scanned: 2.25 MB
> Time: 2.250 sec (0 m 2 s)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ clamscan -V
> ClamAV devel-20050301/738/Tue Mar  1 12:08:00 2005
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ 

The same here:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp$ clamscan-devel dodgy.eml 
dodgy.eml: OK

----------- SCAN SUMMARY -----------
Known viruses: 31316
Engine version: devel-20050301
Scanned directories: 0
Scanned files: 1
Infected files: 0
Data scanned: 2.25 MB
Time: 5.755 sec (0 m 5 s)

-- 
   oo    .....         Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  (\/)\.........         http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg
     \..........._         0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B
       //\   /\              Tue Mar  1 15:26:08 CET 2005

Attachment: pgpqSWdpRsbPo.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Reply via email to