Christopher X. Candreva said: > On Sat, 14 May 2005, Dennis Peterson wrote: > >> Clam runs fine when properly configured. > > And it ran fine for me right up intil 0.85. > >> Are you asking the developers to >> compensate for sloppy administration? I think for that you need a > > No, what I'm asking for is if it runs one day with certain permissions, it > shouldn't fail at the next upgrade without saying something. > >> Microsoft product, and it won't be free. > Changeing behavior suddenly without warning is behavior I usually > associate > with Microsoft prodcuts. Along with your attitude.
So you want code writers who never make a mistake so you don't have to assume any responsibility for your installations. Those coders don't exist, you see, so you are stuck with keeping your systems configured. Get over it. dp _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
