On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 10:03 -0400, Robert Stampfli wrote: > After observing .86 (and .86.1) for several days, I must > completely agree with Damian's assessment. clamav-milter > seems to stablize, but at a memory size that is higher > than previous releases, and the additional memory seems > to be acquired during the first database update (something > that did not happen before). >
Thats expected behaviour. See the archives regarding clmilter becoming quiescent during a reload. -trog
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
