On Sun, 26 Jun 2005, Trog wrote:
On Sat, 2005-06-25 at 10:03 -0400, Robert Stampfli wrote:
> After observing .86 (and .86.1) for several days, I must
> completely agree with Damian's assessment. clamav-milter
> seems to stablize, but at a memory size that is higher
> than previous releases, and the additional memory seems
> to be acquired during the first database update (something
> that did not happen before).
Thats expected behaviour. See the archives regarding clmilter becoming
quiescent during a reload.
Well, not entirely expected. Yes, it makes sense for it to increase
memory usage briefly after each database reload. But the usage seems to
suggest that it's keeping 2 databases in memory at all times, and
sometimes getting a third, which goes away after some time. Of course,
I'm basing all of this on watching the RSS for several days. I haven't
been able to get gdb to tell me exactly what's going on with the
databases.
I'll probably take a closer look at the source next week, if this is
still an open issue by then.
Damian Menscher
--
-=#| Physics Grad Student & SysAdmin @ U Illinois Urbana-Champaign |#=-
-=#| 488 LLP, 1110 W. Green St, Urbana, IL 61801 Ofc:(217)333-0038 |#=-
-=#| 4602 Beckman, VMIL/MS, Imaging Technology Group:(217)244-3074 |#=-
-=#| <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www.uiuc.edu/~menscher/ Fax:(217)333-9819 |#=-
-=#| The above opinions are not necessarily those of my employers. |#=-
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
