Matthew van Eerde wrote:
> Damian Menscher wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>> Dag has it set to spam the spoofed senders
>>>
>>> Um, does he? By my reading of
>>> http://dag.wieers.com/packages/clamav/clamav.spec
>>> ...
>>> --noreject
>>
>> Rather convenient of you to snip THE NEXT LINE:
>> -obl local:%{_localstatedir}/clamav/clmilter.socket
>>
>> Note that the -b is short for --bounce.
OK, in the interest of fairness, here's the list of flags:
%{__cat} <<EOF >clamav-milter.sysconfig
### Simple config file for clamav-milter, you should
### read the documentation and tweak it as you wish.
CLAMAV_FLAGS="
--config-file=%{_sysconfdir}/clamd.conf
--max-children=10
--force-scan
--quiet
--dont-log-clean
--noreject
-obl local:%{_localstatedir}/clamav/clmilter.socket
"
EOF
The relevant entries... which all seem to conflict... are:
--quiet
--noreject
--bounce (AKA -b)
--noreject: to respond OK rather than REJECT on the data phase.
--bounce: send a "virus found" message to the sender and the postmaster.
--quiet: DON'T send a "virus found" message to ANYBODY.
So --bounce and --quiet conflict. According to man clamav-milter on my system,
--quiet wins.
So the net effect seems to be that this config should silently absorb viruses -
accept, destroy, don't deliver.
Or did I miss something else?
--
Matthew.van.Eerde (at) hbinc.com 805.964.4554 x902
Hispanic Business Inc./HireDiversity.com Software Engineer
_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
