On Tue, 2005-09-27 at 18:45 -0500, Damian Menscher wrote: > > I would recommend NOT running those RPMs, unless you do heavy > modification of the configuration. Dag has it set to spam the spoofed > senders (WHY IS THIS EVEN A VALID OPTION IN CLAMAV?). I emailed him > about getting a reasonable configuration last month, but got no > response. I'll try pinging him again on it, since having a fairly > standard RPM would be helpful for many smalltime-admins out there.
This is only clam-milter that is affected by the bounce options, right? I run clam in standalone mode using mimedefang as the milter (with custom handling of virus e-mails). Seems to be much better than running just clam-milter. Anyone who is running clamav-milter, I recommend switching to mimedefang. Many more possibilities for filtering. > > Damian Menscher -- Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
