-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
Karolis Dautartas wrote:
>> Which version?
> It was 0.87. After reading your email I upgraded to 0.88.1
Good. Which OS are you on?
>
>> What does your freshclam log say?
> It had been disabled in the config files. I have enabled it now.
> Aparently the log says something very similar to what I get when
> executing program on the shell. On the shell I get the following:
>
> ClamAV update process started at Wed Apr  5 13:27:16 2006 main.cvd
> is up to date (version: 37, sigs: 46700, f-level: 7, builder:
> ccordes) Downloading daily.cvd [*] ERROR: Mirrors are not fully
> synchronized. Please try again later. Trying again in 5 secs...
> ClamAV update process started at Wed Apr  5 13:33:27 2006 main.cvd
> is up to date (version: 37, sigs: 46700, f-level: 7, builder:
> ccordes) Downloading daily.cvd [*] ERROR: Mirrors are not fully
> synchronized. Please try again later. Trying again in 5 secs...
> ClamAV update process started at Wed Apr  5 13:39:50 2006 main.cvd
> is up to date (version: 37, sigs: 46700, f-level: 7, builder:
> ccordes) Downloading daily.cvd [\]
>
> This time it took about 15 minutes for the process to finish.
That is way too long. Should be a matter of seconds or tens of seconds
if the server extremely loaded. Try changing the default mirror to
another one.
>
>>
>> Tried verbose option?
>>
> Not until I have read your email. I have launched verbose version
> now, it is still running ...
>
> I also tried to fetch the main.cvd file with wget. It took several
> minutes to establish connection, and the transfer rate is about 100
>  bytes per second.
>
>> Why run Freshclam from cron instead of the freshclam daemon?
>
> No idea. It was suggested to run it that way at the time I
> installed it for the first time. And that was probably more than a
> year ago.
Personally, I'm more in favor of running freshclam as a daemon. It
would at least stop you from getting a zillion processes like you have
now. Do note that I consider 100+ freshclam processes a bug. It
shouldn't be allowed to happen, or at least generate a severe warming
somewhere.
Second, I take it not all those processes are downloading anymore.
Netstat should tell you that.
>
>> In which state are those frozen processes, e.g. what are doing?
>
> Not sure, I think they are still "downloading" :)
>
> I have several processes from Mar 20, then Mar 22, Mar 27, then a
> lot of processes from     Mar 29, 30, 31, Apr 01, 02, 03...
>
> Could this be that the mirrors are overloaded? I really think I can
>  contribute to this software by hosting one of the mirrors and at
> least have normal downloads of updates.
I would start with killing all processes. There is no point if having
so many processes doing the same, and they may actually be causing
more problems.
>
> Karolis

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (MingW32)
 
iD8DBQFEM9iiVf373DysOTURAqumAKDHKw0yccGd1ZpnvX31YQ4XaWRn2ACg11SU
fH3kqPXE2Bykp7BYGnY5aFQ=
=q4E4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html

Reply via email to