Jim Redman wrote: > I have to say, of all the lists I subscribe to, the vocal members of > this list are the most arrogant and insulting. However, I consider > comments such as Luca Gibelli's, bandwidth wasting, "We are happy to > suffer this loss." and Dennis Peterson's "His specific problem is he > lacks the skill to install and manage the product" reflect more about > the person making the comment, rather than the target.
I really hope this thread dies a quick death. If you consider L.Gibelli's and D.Petterson's replys a bandwidth wasting, what are you calling your repetitive mindless blather like "I'm not spending another two days monkeying with configuration"? None of the comparably few and well documented options in ClamAv's config files should be hard to understand for someone who is allegedly administrating Linux servers since "late 1.x release", not to mention a software developer like you also alleged to be. As for your comparison with a doorknob, if a doorknob has the better arguments it's reasonable that you don't want to debate with it. I'm sorry for the probably "arrogant and insulting" tone but you're literally asking for it. -- Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. A: Why is putting a reply at the top of the message frowned upon? _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
