Thanks. Upgrade went without a hitch.
We will certainly encourage a timely upgrade once .9 is stable.
Don
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> At 02:58 PM 2/5/2007, Vanco, Don wrote:
>> Any worries around leaping releases as shown? I've built OK and am
>> in the process of looking over the conf file changes as we speak.
>> Any major changes to look at? I had hoped to install it tonight, but
>> obviously want to avoid potential issues. The 2 servers it's going
>> on support 250k emails / day.
>
> The main admin-visible change is the new format of the clamd.conf
> file.
>
> The various options in clamd.conf now must have an explicit
> "yes" or "no" argument, not just be present. Also, the
> clamd.conf man page somewhat implies that "enabled" or
> "disabled" are valid options, but they aren't - accepted
> values are {yes, 1, true} or {no, 0, false}.
>
> Also, a few of the clamscan options have changed. If you have
> any scripts that call clamscan you might want to review their options.
>
> I hope you're planning to update to 0.90 when it's released
> and not just stay on -rc3 indefinitely. While -rc3 seems to
> work well for me, I would be amazed if there aren't some
> issues fixed before 0.90 is released.
>
>> My customer currently has verbose logging enabled - is it very
>> resource intensive?
>
> Turn that off unless you suspect some problem.
>
> --
> Noel Jones
_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
