David, Here is the part where I tell everyone that I am not a lawyer and do not play one on TV. Which means that IMHO unfortunately does not count. I am happy to get the right person to answer your question and respond.
You're right that ensuring everyone's copyright is respected is critical. Tomasz or another member of the team is probably in a better position to answer that one. David F. Skoll wrote: > Mike Guiterman wrote: > >> Commercial Licensing: Today ClamAv is used in a number of commercial >> solutions. ClamAV will continue to be licensed under GPL to vendors >> that distribute the derivative products under the GPL. > > OK, sounds good. Question: We ship ClamAV (plus source as required by GPL) > with a commercial (non-GPL) product. We make use of ClamAV only > through the clamdscan interface over a socket. Do you consider that > to be a "derivative product"? I do not, but I'd like to know where you > stand. > >> The intention is to make ClamAV available under a commercial license as well. > > How will you be sure you have removed all contributed code whose copyright > is not owned by Sourcefire? > > Regards, > > David. > _______________________________________________ > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net > http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html -- Mike Guiterman Snort Community Manager Sourcefire, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (410)423-1930 _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
