On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:33:18 -0400 "David F. Skoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, sounds good. Question: We ship ClamAV (plus source as required by GPL) > with a commercial (non-GPL) product. We make use of ClamAV only > through the clamdscan interface over a socket. Do you consider that > to be a "derivative product"? I do not, but I'd like to know where you > stand. IANAL but I don't consider it a derivative product. > > > The intention is to make ClamAV available under a commercial license as > > well. > > How will you be sure you have removed all contributed code whose copyright > is not owned by Sourcefire? The code base clean-up will be limited to libclamav and will be carefully based on the analysis of the ChangeLog, CVS and SVN entries. Best regards, -- oo ..... Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (\/)\......... http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg \..........._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B //\ /\ Fri Aug 17 20:03:02 CEST 2007 _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
