On Monday 29 October 2007 18:07, Dennis Peterson wrote: > John Rudd wrote: > > John Rudd wrote: > >> I can produce 2 examples of messages that cause the problem, in RFC822 > >> format, for anyone who wants to experiment with them. > > > > I decided I'd just go ahead and make them available: > > > > http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/ClamAV/318642.mbox > > > > http://people.ucsc.edu/~jrudd/ClamAV/318715.mbox > > I have no problem scanning either file with Solaris 10 and clam 0.91.2 > (compiled with pcre). I used clamscan and clamdscan with and without > PhishingURL's enabled. No change. > > clamdscan returned immediately and clamscan takes longer as expected as it > has to load the db files. > > dp > _______________________________________________ > Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net > http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
$ clamscan 318715.mbox 318715.mbox: OK ----------- SCAN SUMMARY ----------- Known viruses: 162803 Engine version: 0.91.2 Scanned directories: 0 Scanned files: 1 Infected files: 0 Data scanned: 0.02 MB Time: 7.569 sec (0 m 7 s) OR $ clamdscan 318715.mbox /home/thomas/318715.mbox: OK ----------- SCAN SUMMARY ----------- Infected files: 0 Time: 0.101 sec (0 m 0 s on a slow Duron 800 -- Thomas _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
