On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 13:18:47 -0600 Michael Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In theory, anything can mess up an AV package. ClamAV had a issue a > while back with bad updates that would crash ClamAV daemon, so yes I > guess technically that could be counted as an instability, even if it > really had nothing to do with the actual definitions or data. One clarification here - the crashes (or rather terminations, since clamd was reporting and error and exiting without a real crash) were caused by some corrupted 3rd party signatures and not the officially distributed databases. -- oo ..... Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (\/)\......... http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg \..........._ 0DCA5A08407D5288279DB43454822DC8985A444B //\ /\ Wed Jan 2 21:15:50 CET 2008 _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
