The sytanx should be:

clamscan --max-filesiz=#n

Below is the exerpt from the man file:
   --max-filesize=#n
  Extract and scan at most #n kilobytes from each archive. You may 
pass the value in megabyte in  format  xM or xm, where x is a number. 
This option protects your system against DoS attacks (default: 25 MB)

Again on either side, clamscan or clamdscan, it should say something 
that a file was not scanned for any reason.  Here is a sample message 
if the file was too large:
The file "the file name" is too large to be scanned. Please consider 
increasing max-filesize setting. Please read 
http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20080313.165458.ac80f65a.en.html (or 
some other warning about DoS and other information about increasing 
max-filesize).
I get these messages from spamassassin running out of child processes 
and I used that as my sample for this type of message.

Frank

>On 9/22/08, Eric Rostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>  Quoting fchan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>
>>   > Remember not everyone that uses clamav is not an expert so for
>>
>>
>>  They don't have to be an expert, they just have to read and configure
>>   the configuration file for their needs.
>>
>>
>>   > someone that is new to clamav thinks that every file that went
>>   > through clamav would be scanned for malware would be incorrect and
>>   > they have a possibility of opening an infected file. I think a
>>
>>
>>  Yes, but they should have read the configuration file, and change it
>>   to meet their needs.  If they didn't, well, that is their fault.
>>
>>
>>   > message or warning that a file that was too large passed through
>>   > clamav without being scanned would be nice so one can take
>>   > appropriate action. That is my opinion.
>>
>>
>>  First, it is not too large to pass through clamav, the user decided
>>   they didn't want it to pass through, or the user was negligent in
>>   configuring it.
>
>I'm using clamscan directly not clamdscan....
>
>How can I change the default behavior without have to specify
>--max-filesize parameter at command line ?
>
>>
>>   Second, I would support such an output only when using the scanner
>>   in "debug" mode...  Would be very useful when debugging, to see such
>>   a message.  In normal mode, I see no reason to force this on the author
>>   against their will.  Even in debug mode, it is up to the author, but
>>   I do think it would be useful in debug mode...
>_______________________________________________
>Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
>http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

_______________________________________________
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml

Reply via email to