On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 09:17 +1300, Jason Haar wrote: > > We use the open source HAVP proxy. It supports clamav, sophie, trophie, > and several other commercial AV products and works very well. We still > use it in conjunction with Squid, as it is a pure "AV proxy" and doesn't > have all the other "bells-and-whistles" that Squid has. We use Squid as > our frontends, and they are configured to use HAVP (running on the same > box) as parent proxies. End result: all the creamy goodness of Squid > plus the sanitized delightedness of clean webpages (well, mostly ;-) > May I ask if this (HAVP/ClamAV/Squid) scales well? How many users are your web-caches supporting (do you in fact run multiple caches?), and does it (HAVP/ClamAV) impose any significant loading on the hardware?
Thanks, John. -- --------------------------------------------------------------- John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK Tel: +44 (0)1752 587287 E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +44 (0)1752 587001 _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
