On 2009-03-29 15:09, christian wrote: > thank you, edwin, for rour speedy response! > > On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 02:58:36PM +0300, Török Edwin wrote: > >> The reason for the failure should be printed right before the line FAIL: >> check_clamd.sh >> > > i don't seem to find it: > > __cut__ > PASS: check_clamav > /EXT/Packages/clamav-0.95/unit_tests/clamdtest1/../../test/clam-v2.rar: OK > /EXT/Packages/clamav-0.95/unit_tests/clamdtest1/../../test/clam-v3.rar: OK > > *** > *** clamd > *** >
clam-v2.rar and clam-v3.rar should be detected as ClamAV-Test-File, and not as OK that is the failure. >> Did you have 0.94.x installed on the machine you tested rc1/rc2? >> Do you have it installed on the machine you are testing 0.95? >> > > this is a productive machine where 94.2 is running successfully, for > quite some time, now. > > i always try to `make check` *before* uninstalling/installing... > Yes, that is good practice, however in this case libtool prefers libclamunrar in /usr/lib instead of the one in the build directory. This is exactly bug #1491. Since these are the only 2 failures, you can run make install, and then run make check again. It should then pass all tests. > >> It may be bug #1491, but I can't tell unless you paste the full results >> from make check. >> > > gladly - i hope nobody is annoyed: > Well you could have used something like pastebin, but nevermind. Best regards, --Edwin _______________________________________________ Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
